Is MultiChoice afraid of IPTV? - Craig Nicholson

Craig Nicholson

My blog has moved to http://craign.net/.

News

My blog has moved to http://craign.net/.


AfrigatorI shmaak SA Blogs, sorted with Amatomu.comSign the petition for Xbox LIVE in South Africa. Locations of visitors to this page

Communities

Development Blogs

Development Tools

General Tools

Personal

Is MultiChoice afraid of IPTV?

This morning I attended the First Tuesday breakfast session on IPTV. Rishaal from Accenture presented a global view of IPTV and whatnot and it was really boring. Next up was Jonathan Newman, head of strategy at MultiChoice. He effectively left the audience believing that IPTV would not be possible in South Africa until Telkom reduced the cost of broadband bandwidth as the current practice of Internet usage capping would lead to prohibitive costs for the consumer.

However he failed to clarify to the audience that IPTV over broadband will not affect your Internet usage cap as it will be a local-loop service and not a public Internet based offering. I also found his references to Telkom as the incumbent operator quite amusing considering that his company is the incumbent Pay TV operator in the country.

What really got me worked up though was a private discussion with him afterward where I questioned his statement that MultiChoice welcomes competition and enquired why numerous attempts from the community to establish a working relationship with MultiChoice for delivery of the DStv Electronic Program Guide (EPG) have failed. I was informed that MultiChoice doesn't plan on making the EPG content available as they see Microsoft Windows Media Center and TiVo-like devices as competition with their very own PVR decoder hardware.

In addition we were informed that MultiChoice plans to offer a hybrid solution similar to BT Vision whereby select content is available through a Video-on-Demand (VoD) system. From what I could gather the system would involve requesting content to be trickle delivered over satellite after requesting and I assume paying for the content through mobile technologies, presumably SMS. Naturally such a solution would be only applicable to those with a PVR decoder as a hard disk would need to be used to store the content while it is delivered. So much for on-demand, it might be faster to drive to a video store and rent a DVD, HD DVD or Blu-ray disc from the local video store.

Speaking on the topic of High Definition TV (HDTV), apparently we shouldn't expect HDTV channels from MultiChoice anytime soon. But we can expect DStv Broadband later in the year which will be delivered as a Web TV solution over the Internet - just in case we really do want to deplete our monthly Internet cap. Personally I think I'll wait for the Telkom Media IPTV offering next year and switch from MultiChoice without hesitation.

For this event to have been really worthwhile I would have liked to have heard from Telkom Media and some of the other players like SABC and E-TV.

Comments

rudi said:

Can't wait for IPTV to hit SA!!

Are you sure about the local cap stuff... as far as I know, that rule changed about 6 months ago?

# July 3, 2007 6:53 PM

Ryan CrawCour said:

Not afraid of competition ... quite right; Multichoice is petrified of it! These guys have for far too long enjoyed the comfort zone that a monopoly affords them!

I say decent competition is the only way to force Multichoice into decent service offerings!

But then again we've all seen just how great the promise of a 2nd land line operator in SA has been ... Helkom still rules the roost and will do so for many years. Perhaps it is time that the govt imposes BEE type restrictions on the previous monopolies to right the imbalances of the past....

# July 4, 2007 7:26 AM

Shaun Trennery said:

Great post. You have very valid points. I tend to disagree on the Multichoice VOD offering thou. I feel that removing the dependency on Telkom has its merits. If Multichoice have the ability to download content to their subscribers, they should use it. I suppose time will only tell if our local offering will ever come close to international services.
# July 4, 2007 8:37 AM

Ryan CrawCour said:

I agree with Craig though on the fact that trickle downloading to a proprietary device can hardly be classified as "on demand". I agree that will be quicker to drive to the local video store and hire the DVD, at least that way I can watch the content I pay for on any device I choose.

# July 4, 2007 11:27 AM

Paul said:

This is all a bunch of business politics. 1) Telkom is required by the law to make local bandwith uncapped. They are dragging their heels on that to protect Telkom Media. 2) Why do content creators need to sell through Multichoice anyway? Whats stoping them from setting up a local server with their content and selling direct? They just can't afford to loose Multichoice's customers in the short term. I think the ultimate winner here could be a dark horse... Altech. They are trying to setup a wimax network. They also can create their own decoders. It just makes sense for content creators to sell through the Altech network because Altech can guarantee better copy protection (with their custom decoders). Wireless will most lickely provide the best bandwith to South African home users in the long term anyway. Think about it, in 10 years... You buy a decoder from Altech... plug it in and you can buy content from 30-40 different content creators. I would go for that. Ultimatly, I don't want a PC in my living room. I don't want to have to "defrag" something before I can watch Battlestar Gallatica. I want to push a button and it must work *every* time.
# July 6, 2007 1:21 PM

CraigN.NET » Blog Archive » IPTV one step closer for South Africans said:

Pingback from  CraigN.NET  » Blog Archive   » IPTV one step closer for South Africans

# September 14, 2007 4:46 PM

Holliday Post « Virgingirl’s Weblog said:

Pingback from  Holliday Post « Virgingirl’s Weblog

# December 28, 2007 8:21 AM