TFS/VSTS,SAArchitect,VSTS Rangers - Willy-Peter Schaub's Cave of Chamomile Simplicity

Browse by Tags

All Tags » TFS/VSTS » SAArchitect » VSTS Rangers (RSS)
Sorry, but there are no more tags available to filter with.

Rangers shipped Visual Studio Team System 2008 Team Foundation Server Management Pack for System Center Operations Management 2007 - English

Just picked up this notification from the rangers, and I quote: This site claims to have found the longest Microsoft product name “MWVUULNSE Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate UPGRADE Limited Numbered Signature Edition”. We beat that with our “VSTS08TFSMP4SCOM07E Visual Studio Team System 2008 Team Foundation Server Management Pack for System Center Operations Management 2007 – English” J It has been an amazing journey to develop and deliver this Ranger solution. We learned...
Posted by willy | with no comments

TFS Branching Guidance II - Revised Look & Feel

We have changed the look and feel of diagrams in the Guidance II document, making lines thinner, removing the start and end branch icon and reducing the font size.   What do you think of this revised look&feel? Share this post: email it! | bookmark it! | digg it! | reddit! | kick it! | live it!
Posted by willy | 6 comment(s)

TFS Branching Guidance II - Proposed look and feel for diagrams

As per Team System Branching Guidance II ... "Attack of the Clones" .... we need your input the VSTS Rangers have embarked on an exciting journey to update the branching guidance. We are working on a new look & feel for the diagrams, which is both professional and appealing ... but most importantly is simple, avoiding unnecessary clutter and noise. The following is the proposed look & feel, with legends: We are finalising the template early next week ... comments? Share this post...
Posted by willy | 6 comment(s)

Team System Branching Guidance II ... "Attack of the Clones" .... we need your input!

The VSTS Rangers and MVPs have started an exciting project to upgrade the TFS Branching Guidance, which can be found here . We need your constructive input of what is good, bad, missing, incorrect and field scenarios would be highly appreciated as input to the upgrade. Have you got a scenario not covered by the current guidance, are you unhappy or uncertain with some of the current content, have you got any ideas we can incorporate? IF yes, then please submit the information and have your say! The...
Posted by willy | 3 comment(s)